[ratelimits] RRL vs other approaches

Tony Finch dot at dotat.at
Wed Feb 20 00:49:46 UTC 2013

There are a couple of problems with Ed's presentation:

(1) Why not send a minimal truncated response rather than a refused response? It is he same size and avoids interop problems.

(2) The only mail server that makes ANY queries is qmail, and it does so for address canonic

f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/

On 19 Feb 2013, at 13:17, Geert Jan de Groot <GeertJan.deGroot at xs4all.nl> wrote:

> At the last NANOG meeting, Ed Lewis spoke about another approach
> to reduce the impact of ANY UDP responses.
> His presentation can be found here:
> http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/presentations/Wednesday/wed.lightning1.lewis.dns.pdf
> I understand that there was some discussion after the talk, but 
> I didn't attend and the videos are not available yet.
> In the interest of evaluating multiple approaches as required for the
> standardisation process, and explicitely not wanting to troll the list 
> (really!), I would be interested to learn what the list thinks about this?
> Geert Jan
> _______________________________________________
> ratelimits mailing list
> ratelimits at lists.redbarn.org
> http://lists.redbarn.org/mailman/listinfo/ratelimits

More information about the ratelimits mailing list