[ratelimits] RRL vs other approaches
dot at dotat.at
Wed Feb 20 00:49:46 UTC 2013
There are a couple of problems with Ed's presentation:
(1) Why not send a minimal truncated response rather than a refused response? It is he same size and avoids interop problems.
(2) The only mail server that makes ANY queries is qmail, and it does so for address canonic
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
On 19 Feb 2013, at 13:17, Geert Jan de Groot <GeertJan.deGroot at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> At the last NANOG meeting, Ed Lewis spoke about another approach
> to reduce the impact of ANY UDP responses.
> His presentation can be found here:
> I understand that there was some discussion after the talk, but
> I didn't attend and the videos are not available yet.
> In the interest of evaluating multiple approaches as required for the
> standardisation process, and explicitely not wanting to troll the list
> (really!), I would be interested to learn what the list thinks about this?
> Geert Jan
> ratelimits mailing list
> ratelimits at lists.redbarn.org
More information about the ratelimits