[ratelimits] Remarks regarding the Knot DNS 1.2.0 RRL implementation
jabley at hopcount.ca
Tue Mar 5 19:55:04 UTC 2013
On 2013-03-05, at 14:03, Joe Abley <jabley at hopcount.ca> wrote:
> I wish there was an option to have
> - exactly Vixie/Schryver RRL on NSD
> - exactly Vixie/Schryver RRL on knot
> to the closest extent possible given the differences in approach between BIND9, NSD and knot, so that we have the best possible chance of sharing a unified operational experience.
Incidentally, I've tried to find people who could implement these things before, and have offered funding. I couldn't find anybody that was interested. It seems worthwhile mouthing the word "funding" again whilst waving my hands, since it came up. If this sounds interesting to anybody, drop me a line.
More information about the ratelimits