<html><head/><body><html><head></head><body>That's what I meant. Thanks ed.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: monospace; margin-top: 0px">At 11:22 +0000 11/14/12, Tony Finch wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">P Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;">An upward delegation is actually a protocol error</blockquote><br />Gosh, really? It seems to be required by the name server algorithm in RFC<br />1034 section 4.3.2 (except if the server is authoritative-only).</blockquote><br />Not a protocol-error but an error-in-the-protocol. (Referring, no <br />pun intended, to the root-referral message used to indicate a server <br />is lame.)</pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html></body></html>