[ratelimits] I-D-ing rate limiting?

[Jared Mauch]

On Apr 16, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net> wrote:

> 
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> 
>> I said that before, but with three implementers(*) out there, I think it's time.  Especially as the implementations still differ yet are interoperable.
> 
> Ed, 
> Can you expand on what you mean by "interoperable" here?  Perhaps s/interoperable/independent/ ?
> 
> I'm not opposed to an informational document that aims to capture the various aspects of the work that's been done, although I think I'm a +1 to Joe (and Paul) as well..

Recall, Ed is the one that has proposed dropping ANY queries :)  I'm not sure if neustar is doing that, but I surely hope not …

- Jared