[ratelimits] I-D-ing rate limiting?
jared at puck.nether.net
Wed Apr 17 01:58:41 UTC 2013
On Apr 16, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
>> I said that before, but with three implementers(*) out there, I think it's time. Especially as the implementations still differ yet are interoperable.
> Can you expand on what you mean by "interoperable" here? Perhaps s/interoperable/independent/ ?
> I'm not opposed to an informational document that aims to capture the various aspects of the work that's been done, although I think I'm a +1 to Joe (and Paul) as well..
Recall, Ed is the one that has proposed dropping ANY queries :) I'm not sure if neustar is doing that, but I surely hope not …
More information about the ratelimits