[ratelimits] I-D-ing rate limiting?
danny at tcb.net
Wed Apr 17 01:53:32 UTC 2013
On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> I said that before, but with three implementers(*) out there, I think it's time. Especially as the implementations still differ yet are interoperable.
Can you expand on what you mean by "interoperable" here? Perhaps s/interoperable/independent/ ?
I'm not opposed to an informational document that aims to capture the various aspects of the work that's been done, although I think I'm a +1 to Joe (and Paul) as well..
More information about the ratelimits