[ratelimits] I-D-ing rate limiting?

Danny McPherson danny at tcb.net
Wed Apr 17 01:53:32 UTC 2013

On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:

> I said that before, but with three implementers(*) out there, I think it's time.  Especially as the implementations still differ yet are interoperable.

Can you expand on what you mean by "interoperable" here?  Perhaps s/interoperable/independent/ ?

I'm not opposed to an informational document that aims to capture the various aspects of the work that's been done, although I think I'm a +1 to Joe (and Paul) as well..


More information about the ratelimits mailing list