[ratelimits] one more on FreeBSD and new RRL patch
Erwin Lansing
erwin at lansing.dk
Tue Jan 8 19:30:28 UTC 2013
Hi Paul,
On Jan 8, 2013, at 20:05, Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:
> as vernon writes, the rpz fixes ought not worry anybody. if you're
> clicking the "i want rrl" button then you're asking for code that's not
> supported yet as part of ISC BIND itself. you might as well get other
> rpz-related fixes with that, since they have the same status.
Fair enough.
>
> i urge that package maintainers and rrl users make use of the smaller of
> the two rpz-inclusive rrl patches.
>
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll look into that tomorrow.
Erwin
> paul
>
> re:
>
> Mark Boolootian wrote:
>> It wasn't clear to me from the "new RRL patch includes RPZ patches"
>> thread whether the new patch was going to make into ports or not.
>> Does the RRL/RPZ patch merge mean the end-of-the-line for RRL patch
>> updates in ports? I'd hope not, but I can appreciate the challenges
>> on both sides of the issue...
>>
>> mark
>> _______________________________________________
>> ratelimits mailing list
>> ratelimits at lists.redbarn.org
>> http://lists.redbarn.org/mailman/listinfo/ratelimits
More information about the ratelimits
mailing list