[ratelimits] one more on FreeBSD and new RRL patch

Erwin Lansing erwin at lansing.dk
Tue Jan 8 19:30:28 UTC 2013

Hi Paul,

On Jan 8, 2013, at 20:05, Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:

> as vernon writes, the rpz fixes ought not worry anybody. if you're
> clicking the "i want rrl" button then you're asking for code that's not
> supported yet as part of ISC BIND itself. you might as well get other
> rpz-related fixes with that, since they have the same status.

Fair enough.
> i urge that package maintainers and rrl users make use of the smaller of
> the two rpz-inclusive rrl patches.
Thanks for the suggestion.  I'll look into that tomorrow.


> paul
> re:
> Mark Boolootian wrote:
>> It wasn't clear to me from the "new RRL patch includes RPZ patches"
>> thread whether the new patch was going to make into ports or not.
>> Does the RRL/RPZ patch merge mean the end-of-the-line for RRL patch
>> updates in ports?  I'd hope not, but I can appreciate the challenges
>> on both sides of the issue...
>> mark
>> _______________________________________________
>> ratelimits mailing list
>> ratelimits at lists.redbarn.org
>> http://lists.redbarn.org/mailman/listinfo/ratelimits

More information about the ratelimits mailing list