[ratelimits] results of responses/sec, slip and window size settings
Masato Minda
minmin at jprs.co.jp
Wed May 15 04:35:54 UTC 2013
On 2013/05/15 7:41, Vernon Schryver wrote:
>
> It is not an accident or oversight that the rrl tests in
> bin/tests/system/rrl/tests.sh do not use queryperf. Queryperf is a
> fine tool for its intended purposes, but I do not think those purposes
> include fine grain RRL testing. I'm not proud of the `dig` kludge in
> rrl/tests.sh, but I think it works better than queryperf.
Yes, queryperf is not suitable for RRL. Of course, I used it at first
test. However I was confused by the report of it.
Here is my testing procedure.
1. setup the BIND *without* RRL
2. using 'queryperf' to that target
3. capture query data of 'queryperf' with 'tcpdump'
4. stop the BIND, then start the BIND with RRL
5. replay query data with 'tcpreplay' and test it
It is good for testing RRL that tcpreplay is easy to change the
queries/second.
--
Masato minmin Minda <minmin at jprs.co.jp>
Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd. (JPRS)
More information about the ratelimits
mailing list